Pick up to 4 vehicles to compare side-by-side. State lives in the URL — share the link and the comparison loads exactly as you left it. No JavaScript required.
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operator | Blue Origin | SpaceX |
| Prime contractor | Blue Origin | SpaceX |
| Status | In development | In development |
| Customer | NASA-CLPS | NASA-HLS |
| Launch date | 2026-07 (NET) | 2027 (NET — Artemis III) |
| Landing date | — | — |
| Landing site | Lunar south pole region | Lunar south pole (NASA-curated candidate region near 84-90°S) |
| Payload | 3,000 kg surface payload capacity (21,350 kg wet lander mass) (2026-05-28) | ~100 tonnes to lunar surface (sustained variant target) (2024-04-16) |
| Contract value | — | $2.89B + $1.15B Option B = $4.04B total (2022-11-15) |
| Outcome | First flight test of Blue Moon Mark 1. Carries NASA CLPS Stereo Cameras for Lunar Plume-Surface Studies + Laser Retroreflective Array. Targets 100 m landing precision. Lander completed full-scale thermal-vacuum testing at NASA Plum Brook (Armstrong Test Facility) May 2026. | Selected April 2021 as sole HLS provider for Artemis III. Architecture requires Super Heavy launch + multiple Starship tanker refueling flights in LEO + transit to NRHO + rendezvous with Orion (SLS). NASA OIG IG-26-004 (March 2026) flagged crew-rescue capability as open risk. October 2025: NASA acting administrator Sean Duffy reopened Artemis III lander contract to competition due to Starship development pace. |
Pure URL state — no JavaScript, no localStorage, no cookies. The comparison renders entirely on the server from the slugs in the query string. Bookmark or share the URL and the comparison reproduces exactly.
Underlying dataset: GET /api/moon/landers. Methodology: /moon/methodology.