Pick up to 4 vehicles to compare side-by-side. State lives in the URL — share the link and the comparison loads exactly as you left it. No JavaScript required.
| Attribute | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operator | SpaceX | Astrobotic |
| Prime contractor | SpaceX | Astrobotic |
| Status | In development | Lost |
| Customer | NASA-HLS | NASA-CLPS |
| Launch date | 2027 (NET — Artemis III) | 2024-01-08 |
| Landing date | — | — |
| Landing site | Lunar south pole (NASA-curated candidate region near 84-90°S) | Sinus Viscositatis (planned; never reached) |
| Payload | ~100 tonnes to lunar surface (sustained variant target) (2024-04-16) | 20 payloads from 7 nations (2024-01-08) |
| Contract value | $2.89B + $1.15B Option B = $4.04B total (2022-11-15) | $108M (2024-01-08) |
| Outcome | Selected April 2021 as sole HLS provider for Artemis III. Architecture requires Super Heavy launch + multiple Starship tanker refueling flights in LEO + transit to NRHO + rendezvous with Orion (SLS). NASA OIG IG-26-004 (March 2026) flagged crew-rescue capability as open risk. October 2025: NASA acting administrator Sean Duffy reopened Artemis III lander contract to competition due to Starship development pace. | Maiden flight of ULA's Vulcan Centaur. Helium pressurant valve failed to reseal post-actuation, over-pressurizing the oxidizer tank and rupturing it. Lander commanded into controlled re-entry; burned up over South Pacific 2024-01-18. |
Pure URL state — no JavaScript, no localStorage, no cookies. The comparison renders entirely on the server from the slugs in the query string. Bookmark or share the URL and the comparison reproduces exactly.
Underlying dataset: GET /api/moon/landers. Methodology: /moon/methodology.