SpaceX · USA
Blue Origin · USA
| Falcon 9 | Metric | New Glenn |
|---|---|---|
| 22,800 kg | Payload to LEO | +97% more45,000 kg |
| 8,300 kg | Payload to GTO | +57% more13,000 kg |
| 70 m | Height | +40% more98 m |
| ~$2,720/kg | Cost per kg | +81% more~$1,500/kg |
| 99.5%+49% more | Success Rate | 67% |
| 2010+1% more | First Flight | 2025 |
| Yes | Reusable | Yes |
| SpaceX | Company | Blue Origin |
| USA | Country | USA |
Payload to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) — relative scale
Payload to Geostationary Transfer Orbit (GTO)
2
Falcon 9 wins
1
Tied
4
New Glenn wins
New Glenn delivers 97% more more payload to LEO, making it the heavier lifter.
New Glenn is more cost-effective at ~$1,500/kg vs ~$2,720/kg.
Falcon 9 has a higher success rate (99.5% vs 67%), indicating greater flight heritage.
Overall, New Glenn wins on more metrics (4 vs 2), though each rocket is designed for different mission profiles.
These two American rockets answer the same question from opposite ends of experience. Falcon 9 is the most flown orbital rocket in history, with roughly 668 successful flights across the Falcon family and a 99.5% success rate, its Block 5 boosters having landed more than 280 times and reflown up to 23 times. New Glenn, by contrast, had flown just three times as of mid-2026. Blue Origin's vehicle is a genuinely bigger machine, lifting about 45,000 kg to LEO against Falcon 9's 22,800 kg (expendable), and its 7-meter payload fairing is the widest in production, dwarfing Falcon 9's roughly 5.2-meter shroud. But raw capacity is not the same as trust. New Glenn's short record already includes turbulence: NG-3 (April 2026) placed its AST SpaceMobile payload in the wrong orbit after a BE-3U upper-stage underperformance and drew an FAA grounding, and on May 28, 2026 a vehicle was destroyed in a prelaunch static-fire explosion at LC-36, with Blue Origin now targeting a return to flight before the end of 2026 via a rebuilt launch pad.
For cost-per-kilogram and schedule certainty on standard commercial, government, and constellation payloads, Falcon 9 wins decisively today. It lists near $67M (roughly $2,720/kg expendable, far less amortized against reuse), it launches on a cadence no competitor approaches, and its reliability is a settled fact rather than a projection. If you need a satellite in orbit this quarter, Falcon 9 is the default and effectively the only high-cadence Western option. New Glenn's advantage is geometric, not economic: for a single oversized or high-volume payload, a monolithic large observatory, a wide bus, or a heavy stack that simply will not fit inside a Falcon 9 fairing, its 7-meter volume and higher single-launch mass open envelopes Falcon 9 cannot reach without stepping up to Falcon Heavy.
The deeper contrast is lineage and intent. Falcon 9 is a proven, iterated workhorse whose reusability is battle-tested; New Glenn is Blue Origin's first orbital vehicle, and its BE-4-powered first stage and hydrogen BE-3U upper stage represent a clean-sheet architecture still finding its footing. For a customer valuing a second credible heavy-class reusable supplier, and for breaking Falcon's near-monopoly, New Glenn matters strategically. But for anyone weighing which rocket to actually book in 2026, Falcon 9 is the safe, cheap, available answer, while New Glenn is the promising challenger that must first prove it can fly reliably before its greater size becomes a decisive edge.